Posts: 1,779
Threads: 61
Joined: Mar 2020
Reputation:
0
30k over 3 months divided by the home league matches fans are missing (8) gives us gate money for ~865 fans, presuming the funding is only supposed to offset gate takings (not additional spending in the ground). That’s not a bad amount, certainly better than ~300-400.
Posts: 6,657
Threads: 448
Joined: Mar 2020
Reputation:
-2
But a fairer split could've been £40k to step 2 clubs and £60k to step 1. They don't need £54kpm more than us!
Alex Petheram
Unregistered
In football sadly there will always be winners and losers ... sadly today we've in the losing team ... We've had no consideration for anything based on our position etc ...
What can you do ... we move forward and deal with the hand we've got.
AP
Posts: 361
Threads: 31
Joined: May 2020
Reputation:
0
whilst the money is better than nothing, there will be a huge shortfall from sponsorship and other additional revenue including the 'new groundhoppers'
Posts: 701
Threads: 43
Joined: Mar 2020
Reputation:
2
We're hoping to get sponsorship for the streaming if you can badger the companies you work for. On a per match basis or would consider a generous offer to cover them all.
If you know someone interested please get them to email media@gcafc.co.uk
Posts: 3,157
Threads: 28
Joined: Mar 2020
Reputation:
4
On the face of it we have done very well out of this. Given those clubs with much higher crowd numbers than us have only got £6k more at our level it could have been much worse. I was surprised we were getting as much as £30k to be honest was expecting it to be less.
Posts: 2,035
Threads: 48
Joined: Mar 2020
Reputation:
3
May I ask the official source of these figures that have been mentioned.