16-12-2020, 10:18 PM
(16-12-2020, 09:18 PM)OldDirtyGlasses Wrote: The incident should have been a stop in play, therefore the second goal may not have been scored (referee error) and at 1-0 with 3 mins plus (I think it was minimum) 4 added on time any result was possible. The fact the ref gave a goal before realising the seriousness of the injury means the committee probably had no fair alternative. Think I read that Boston were roughhousing the whole game, bordering on dangerous play on many occasions. It does seem crazy but I can see their thinking.If that’s the facts then yes I can understand their motives.